Dr. Danielle Vermaak

Dr. Danielle Veramaak

Danielle was born in South Africa and grew up in Port Elizabeth and Pretoria. She received a Bachelors degree from the University of Pretoria in 1989, majoring in Biochemistry and Chemistry. Danielle moved to Cape Town University to persue her interest in protein-DNA interactions. For her masters thesis she purified a poly(dG)-binding protein from sea urchin embryos, and used DNA footprinting techniques to characterize its DNA binding properties.

Danielle moved to the United States in 1993, working as a technician at the National Institutes of Health for one year, studying the genes that are turned on during metamorphosis in frogs. During her graduate research in Alan Wolffe's lab at the NIH, Danielle worked on transcriptional repression by histone H1 and histone deacetylase RPD3 in frog oocytes and embryos. Linker histones such as H1 help package nucleosomal DNA into higher order structures. In Xenopus, somatic histone H1 replaces the cleavage stage variant during gastrulation. This transition causes the repression of genes encoding the oocyte-type 5S rRNA and restricts the competence of ectodermal cells to differentiate into mesoderm. Danielle and colleagues showed that the globular domain of somatic H1 is sufficient for directing these changes, suggesting that compaction of nucleosomal arrays by charged H1 tail domains is not required. Another way in which genes can be turned off is through deacetylation of histone tails. Danielle cloned the RPD3 histone deacetylase from Xenopus and used oocyte microinjection experiments to show it functioned in transcriptional repression of reporter genes. This repression required deacetylase activity and nuclear import of RPD3 mediated by a carboxy-terminal nuclear localization signal. Danielle further characterized the interactions between RPD3, RbAp48 and histone H4. Histone deacetylase appeared to be directed to specific promoters through interaction with RbAp48 in the absence of sin3 co-repressor.

Danielle received her PhD in Biology from Johns Hopkins University in 1999 and moved to Seattle to do a postdoc in Steve Henikoff's lab at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research center, working on evolutionary and molecular aspects of centromeric histone in (Cid) Drosophila. All centromeres require specialized chromatin containing a variant histone H3. Since the DNA sequence at centromeres is not conserved, the mechanism of localization of these variant histones is unclear. By making chimeras between Drosophila melanogaster Cid and Cid from a divergent species that was unable to target melanogaster centromeres, Danielle and colleagues showed that Loop I of the histone fold domain was a critical targeting determinant. Loop I is a known DNA-binding site of H3 within the nucleosome and is under positive selection in flies, as shown by Harmit Malik, also in the Henikoff lab at the time. This strongly suggested that DNA specificity is important for targeting, perhaps through discriminating loop I-DNA contacts during histone deposition.

In the Henikoff lab, Danielle began studying Rhino, a heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) predominantly expresed in the Drosophila ovary. Danielle is continuing this and other research projects as a staff scientist in the Malik lab. She is particularly interested in chromatin proteins evolving under positive selection. Elucidating the driving force of such selection can uncover novel biological functions of chromatin proteins and lead to a better understanding of the fixation of less than optimal alleles in populations.

Heterochromatin commonly contains HP1 proteins defined by the presence of a N-terminal chromo domain and C-terminal shadow domain connected by a hinge region. Drosophila melanogaster flies have five HP1s. HP1a-like proteins bind to histone H3 methylated on lysine 9 and is required for the maintenance of heterochromatin. Rhino is different from the other HP1s because it is predominantly expressed during oogenesis and early development. This is an unusual expression profile for a protein presumed to have a structural function in chromatin. Upon examining the molecular evolution of Rhino in closely related Drosophila species, we found strong evidence for adaptive evolution, or selection for replacement amino acids changes. This selection for amino acid change is unexpected and striking in comparison to other HP1 proteins that are undergoing purifying evolution, i.e. selection against amino acid replacement changes. Current and future experiments are focused on identifying the driving force behind the positive selection of Rhino.

Danielle is married to Chris Lausted, a research engineer at the Institute for Systems Biology. Danielle and Chris have two daughters, Maddie (almost 4 years) and Josie (1 year old). They live in Ballard, Seattle. More pictures of the family are available on her personal website (http://lausteds.com/danielle/).



Research Papers

  1. Vermaak D., Henikoff S., Malik H.S. Positive Selection Drives the Evolution of rhino, a Member of the Heterochromatin Protein 1 Family in Drosophila PLOS in Genetics 2005 (1):96-108 PDF file 7,387 KB

  2. Vermaak D, Ahmad K, Henikoff S. Maintenance of chromatin states: an open-and-shut case. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2003 Jun;15(3):266-74. Review. PDF file 332 KB

  3. Buvelot S, Tatsutani SY, Vermaak D, Biggins S. The budding yeast Ipl1/Aurora protein kinase regulates mitotic spindle disassembly. J Cell Biol. 2003 Feb 3;160(3):329-39. PDF file 1,813 KB

  4. Vermaak D, Hayden HS, Henikoff S. Centromere targeting element within the histone fold domain of Cid. Mol Cell Biol. 2002 Nov;22(21):7553-61. PDF file 1,160 KB

  5. Malik HS, Vermaak D, Henikoff S. Recurrent evolution of DNA-binding motifs in the Drosophila centromeric histone. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Feb 5;99(3):1449-54. PDF file 676 KB

  6. Henikoff S, Vermaak D. Bugs on drugs go GAGAA. Cell. 2000 Nov 22;103(5):695-8. Review. No abstract available. PDF file 272 KB

  7. Vermaak D, Wade PA, Jones PL, Shi YB, Wolffe AP. Functional analysis of the SIN3-histone deacetylase RPD3-RbAp48-histone H4 connection in the Xenopus oocyte. Mol Cell Biol. 1999 Sep;19(9):5847-60. PDF file 1,427 KB

  8. Wade PA, Jones PL, Vermaak D, Wolffe AP. Purification of a histone deacetylase complex from Xenopus laevis: preparation of substrates and assay procedures. Methods Enzymol. 1999;304:715-25.

  9. Strouboulis J, Damjanovski S, Vermaak D, Meric F, Wolffe AP. Transcriptional repression by XPc1, a new Polycomb homolog in Xenopus laevis embryos, is independent of histone deacetylase. Mol Cell Biol. 1999 Jun;19(6):3958-68. PDF file 1,981 KB

  10. Wade PA, Jones PL, Vermaak D, Veenstra GJ, Imhof A, Sera T, Tse C, Ge H, Shi YB, Hansen JC, Wolffe AP. Histone deacetylase directs the dominant silencing of transcription in chromatin: association with MeCP2 and the Mi-2 chromodomain SWI/SNF ATPase. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1998;63:435-45.

  11. Wade PA, Jones PL, Vermaak D, Wolffe AP. A multiple subunit Mi-2 histone deacetylase from Xenopus laevis cofractionates with an associated Snf2 superfamily ATPase. Curr Biol. 1998 Jul 2;8(14):843-6. Abstract

  12. Jones PL, Veenstra GJ, Wade PA, Vermaak D, Kass SU, Landsberger N, Strouboulis J, Wolffe AP. Methylated DNA and MeCP2 recruit histone deacetylase to repress transcription. Nat Genet. 1998 Jun;19(2):187-91. PDF file 290 KB

  13. Vermaak D, Steinbach OC, Dimitrov S, Rupp RA, Wolffe AP. The globular domain of histone H1 is sufficient to direct specific gene repression in early Xenopus embryos. Curr Biol. 1998 Apr 23;8(9):533-6. Abstract

  14. Vermaak D, Wolffe AP. Chromatin and chromosomal controls in development.Dev Genet. 1998;22(1):1-6. Review. Abstract

  15. Wong J, Patterton D, Imhof A, Guschin D, Shi YB, Wolffe AP. Distinct requirements for chromatin assembly in transcriptional repression by thyroid hormone receptor and histone deacetylase. EMBO J. 1998 Jan 15;17(2):520-34. PDF file 785 KB

  16. Patterton D, Wolffe AP. Developmental roles for chromatin and chromosomal structure. Dev Biol. 1996 Jan 10;173(1):2-13.

  17. Patterton D, Hayes WP, Shi YB. Transcriptional activation of the matrix metalloproteinase gene stromelysin-3 coincides with thyroid hormone-induced cell death during frog metamorphosis. Dev Biol. 1995 Jan;167(1):252-62.

  18. Patterton D, Shi YB. Thyroid hormone-dependent differential regulation of multiple arginase genes during amphibian metamorphosis. J Biol Chem. 1994 Oct 14;269(41):25328-34.

  19. Patterton D, Hapgood J. suGF1 binds in the major groove of its oligo(dG).oligo(dC) recognition sequence and is excluded by a positioned nucleosome core. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Feb;14(2):1410-8. Abstract

  20. Hapgood J, Patterton D. Purification of an oligo(dG).oligo(dC)-binding sea urchin nuclear protein, suGF1: a family of G-string factors involved in gene regulation during development. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Feb;14(2):1402-9. Abstract

Danielle Vermaak
Last Modified 8/16/07


Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
1100 Fairview Ave. N. PO Box 19024 Seattle, WA 98109
©2008 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, a nonprofit organization.
Terms of Use & Privacy Policy.